How about a Special Achievement Award for Zemeckis?
There is a lot of talk lately about the eligibility of Robert Zemeckis' upcoming "Beowulf" in the Best Animated Feature category. There is also a concerted effort to refrain from pitching the film as an animated endeavor for awards attention. Additionally, the director himself has even said that "to call performance capture animation is a disservice to the great animators."The fact is that it's very likely the animation branch will not nominate Zemeckis' motion-capture film, just as they snubbed "The Polar Express" in 2004. The sound departments will certainly be on board (Gerard Kennedy fleshed out some interesting talking points with sound mixer Randy Thom at In Contention yesterday), and perhaps the music branch will follow suit -- again, just as in 2004. But whether the film is good enough to muster a Best Picture nomination is still to be seen
Regardless of all of this, I think it's worth taking note of Zemeckis' obvious desire to push the industry forward by leaps and bounds. Maybe he deserves some kind of recognition outside of the Oscar ceremony's typical order of proceedings.
In 1988, Zemeckis' "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" garnered a Special Achievement award for animation director Richard Williams, and it was obviously very deserving considering how innovative the effort was at the time. It's been a while since the Academy has gone out of its way to offer such a designation, and given that Zemeckis is leading the charge on what very well could be the next major phase in cinema technology, perhaps it's time to dust that award off and toss it his way once again.
After "Beowulf," Zemeckis will be diving right back into the motion-capture fray with the Jim Carrey-starrer "A Christmas Carol," in which Carrey will portray Ebenezer Scrooge and all four of the ghosts from the tale.
Red Carpet District is Variety contributor Kristopher Tapley's attempt at making sense of the ever-expanding glut of film awards coverage. He's been on the beat for six years. Email 


I would think that if Zemeckis was to be honored for his work in this field, it would have happened back in "Polar Express", the first film to fully use it, like when "Toy Story" (the first all-CGI) won the Oscar for John Lasseter for Animation Directing in 1995. Now, it's a little too late. Plus, the technology is still controversial and not exactly as embraced as CGI first was (see previous comment for a perfect example). Maybe in the Sci/Tech awards? (It may have already won one of those even) Plus, isn't there a rule now that honorary Oscars can only be given to non-winners? Zemeckis, of course, won for directing "Gump".
Posted by: Kirby | 11/4/2007 4:28:28 PM
I still don't understand the point of motion-capture animation. If you're going to animate characters that look strikingly like Angelina Jolie and Anthony Hopkins, why not just film the real actors in front of a blue screen?
I don't understand why so much money and time is spent on replicating real people, because no matter how good the technology becomes, it'll never match the presence of a filmed actor.
And besides, I can't imagine it's much fun to act while there's hundreds of little computer sensors on your face and body.
Posted by: yej | 11/2/2007 5:04:28 PM