THE NOMINEES: 'Charlie Wilson's War'
Actor in a Supporting Role Phillip Seymour Hoffman

We're anxiously awaiting the SAG announcement, but in the meantime...
• Warner Bros. unleashes the high def tailer for "The Dark Knight" onto a salivating web-geek community. [A Taste for the Theatrical]
Sean Penn's "Into the Wild" led the BFCA nominations tally today with seven tips of the hat, including nods for Best Director, Best Actor, Best Adapted Screenplay and, of course, a spot in the group's top ten list.
Jason Reitman's "Juno" wasn't far behind with six nods, while "Atonement," "Michael Clayton," "No Country for Old Men" and "Sweeney Todd" each managed five.
The morning's announcement was a huge boost -- nay, a shot in the arm for "Wild," one of a trio of Paramount Vantage hopefuls in this year's race. Combined with a number of key mentions in yesterday's Chicago Film Critics nominations and the fact that, as far as I can tell, no film has ever solely led the BFCA field and missed out on a Best Picture nomination with the Academy, I'd say the Sean Penn effort is looking better than ever for a slot in the big five come January.
"Juno"'s tally of six was also exactly what Fox Searchlight's comedy hopeful needed to silence nay-sayers regarding its Academy potential. It's clearly a formiddable contender.
Surprises included Best Actor mentions for Ryan Gosling ("Lars and the Real Girl") and Viggo Mortensen ("Eastern Promises"), as well as supporting actress berths for Catherine Keener in "Into the Wild" (a quiet contender this season) and Vanessa Redgrave in "Atonement" (for all of five minutes of screentime).
Casey Affleck, meanwhile, grabbed some more steam for his supporting portrayal in "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford," perhaps on his way to securing the same nod with the Academy. And Amy Adams finally makes a significant appearance this awards season for her performance in "Enchanted."
A definite nod of note is Cate Blanchett's citation for Best Actress in "Elizabeth: The Golden Age." It might perhaps be read as Oscar tea leaf reading on the BFCA's part more than anything, given how critically reviled the film was, yet how undeniably Academy friendly the performance might still be perceived.
Finally, six composers were allowed room to wiggle in that category, including the first notices of the season for Marco Beltrami ("3:10 to Yuma"), Clint Eastwood ("Grace is Gone") and Alan Menken ("Enchanted").
The BFCA tends to be the best precursor for predicting the eventual Oscar turn-out, mostly due to a list of ten Best Picture contenders and a willingness to nominate across a wide spectrum of categories. This year they seem to have spread the wealth evenly enough to have a decent prediction percentage yet again.
The BFCA's ten Best Picture nominees (with vote totals):
"American Gangster" (2)
"Atonement" (5)
"The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" (4)
"Into the Wild" (7)
"Juno" (6)
"The Kite Runner" (2)
"Michael Clayton" (5)
"No Country for Old Men" (5)
"Sweeney Todd" (5)
"There Will Be Blood" (3)
The full list of nominees can be found on the BFCA website. The awards will be broadcast live on VH1 on Monday, January 7, 2008, LIVE at 9:00 p/m. (e.s.t.).
Erik Childress' "Oscar Eye" column has the full list of Chicago Film Critics nominations mixed in with his tally of who's won what. You have to kind of pick things out, but the full list is there.
• Sasha Stone jumos on board the "Juno" express. [Awards Daily]
• David Carr runs some insular Times commentary regarind the L.A. premiere of "Juno." [The Carpetbagger]
Johnny Depp moved up a few nothces this week in The Envelope's Buzzmeter standings, but I was pretty stoked to see Casey Affleck bounce back into the supporting actor field. It seems most people are pretty confident in nominations for Javier Bardem ("No Country for Old Men"), Hal Holbrook ("Into the Wild"), Tom Wilkinson ("Michaely Clayton") and Phillip Seymour Hoffman ("Charlie Wilson's War"), with a fifth slot up for grabs.
• Variety has a SAG Awards preview, including Zachary Pincus-Roth's chat with casting directors about finding the right balance in front of the camera. [Variety]Us pesky bloggers weren't terribly impressed, but Variety and The Hollywood Reporter both came to the resuce of "Charlie Wilson's War" yesterday, with Todd McCarthy and Kirk Honeycutt running positive assessments.
I'll just re-publish Jeffrey Wells' quick item:
Todd McCarthy called it "a smart, sophisticated entertainment for grownups...snappy, amusing and ruefully ironic." And the Hollywood Reporter's Kirk Honeycutt said...well, it's hard to find a tight summation of opinion, but he notes that this "outrageous tale of 1980s-era good corruption, apparently largely true and all the more outrageous for that, might be the perfect antidote to today's shrill political scene with Republicans and Democrats staking out intractable positions and accomplishing little."
• Michael Cieply on the "ghettoized" Animated Feature category and the Best Picture hopes of "Ratatouille." [New York Times]
• "Into the Wild" wins the season's first major Best Picture prize at the Gotahm Awards. [Variety]
• Variety begins coverage of the Gotham Awards. [Variety]
At a concise and seemingly amputated 97 minutes, "Charlie Wilson's War" may have surprised more than a few of tonight's press-heavy crowd when the credits suddenly rolled at Universal's first major west coast exhibition of the film this evening.
That's not to say they didn't like it (judging by a modest but warm round of applause), or that there isn't anything to like about the film. There was plenty of laughter throughout (mostly at the lines delivered by Phillip Seymour Hoffman's cut-throat Gust Avrakotos) and a generaly air of enjoyment in the crowd. But when reactions start to hit the net later this evening, tomorrow morning or later into the week (here's a knee-jerk from yours truly), I expect a number of the Oscar-watching readership to realize that we're all guilty of building buzz too strongly, hustling to anoint something a "frontrunner" based on pedigree, all in the name of forecasting a scenario that proves itself malleable and ignorant of hard and fast rules year in and year out.
Anyway, I won't make any declarations in this space, but we'll see what the critics and awards analysts have to say soon enough. For now, Tom O'Neil, who was at the New York screening of the film earlier this evening, has some thoughts up.
• Yours truly takes a look at "The Great Debaters." [In Contention]
I thought I'd waste a few brain cells this morning and dig through all these prognosticative charts to see what the consensus is amongst those of us crazy enough to go on the record with predictions months out from the Oscar ceremony.
For those unaware, there is the Buzzmeter at The Envelope, a group comprised of 21 critics, columnists and awards analysts; the Gurus o' Gold at Movie City News, a smaller group of 14 similar types (with some Buzzmeter overlap); Gurus 2.0, also at Movie City News, a collective of 15 self-starting webmasters and contributors from some other sanctioned outlets not typically considered for their Oscar coverage; and newly formed, the Sultans of Bling at Awards Daily, a unique group comprised of 22 "civilians," if you will, individuals without outlets or platforms beyond comments sections in this site or that (save AW contributors Ryan C. Adams and Sasha Stone).
If you're not tongue-tied yet, I'll continue.
Three of the groups use a ranking system of 10 for their panelists. A #1 choice gets a score of 10, a #2 a score of 9, etc. The only group that uses a five-list system is the Buzzmeter, which obviously gives that collective less opportunity to add other titles to the ring beyond their respective top fives. One might expect, therefore, a lesser amount of films to be represented by the Buzzmeter. They list 16, but the Gurus o' Gold list a total of 17 films, with each panelist having the opportunity to list up to ten films. But to be fair, the Buzzmeter also has seven extra members, so it's kind of a give and take.
I tallied up the scores from each of the films predicted for Best Picture today and came to some interesting findings. First and foremost, "Into the Wild" gets a huge boost (landing in the #6 spot) by being a clear favorite for two groups, Gurus 2.0 and the Sultans. The main Gurus and the Buzzmeter, however, have the film listed at #12 and #10 respectively.
Many films, of course, are listed across all four groups, but the Sultans, for instance, are the only group to include "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford," "Beowulf," "Control," "The Golden Compass," "I'm Not There," "Lars and the Real Girl," "Ratatouille," "Rescue Dawn" and "We Own the Night." Of those nine, I don't think it is out of bounds to say at least six have no shot at Best Picture contention, but the unique flavor is certainly welcome.
The Sultans, also, join Gurus 2.0 as the only groups to include "Zodiac" in their lists, while the latter is the only collective to feature "In the Valley of Elah" and "Things We Lost in the Fire." The main Gurus group, meanwhile, is the only group to list "The Savages."
31 films are represented in total, while the Buzzmeter's 16 are the only ones shared across the board.
Now, let's get to the consensus chart. Here's the full, ranked list of 31 films predicted for Best Picture by the four prognosticative groups out there on the Oscarweb:
01. "Atonement" (482)Obviously -- and as if this wasn't clear to begin with -- "Atonement" is the frontrunner for a nomination in this year's Best Picture race, if we're to go by what these collectives have to say. This seems to have been the case ever since the Venice bow of the film back in September.
02. "No Country for Old Men" (472)
03. "There Will Be Blood" (248)
04. "American Gangster "(231)
05. "The Kite Runner" (223)
06. "Into the Wild" (188)
07. "Charlie Wilson’s War" (173)
08. "Sweeney Todd" (170)
09. "Michael Clayton" (167)
10. "Juno" (144)
11. "Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead" (114)
12. "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly" (84)
13. "3:10 to Yuma"(56)
14. "Once" (47)
15. "Zodiac" (34)
16. "Eastern Promises" (16)
17. "Hairspray" (13)
18. "The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford" (12)
19. "In the Valley of Elah" (12)
20. "I’m Not There" (11)
21. "Ratatouille" (7)
22. "Rescue Dawn" (7)
23. "The Savages" (7)
24. "Elizabeth: The Golden Age" (6)
25. "Gone Baby Gone" (3)
26. "Control" (3)
27. "Things We Lost in the Fire" (2)
28. "The Golden Compass" (2)
29. "Lars and the Real Girl" (2)
30. "We Own the Night" (1)
31. "Beowulf" (1)
In today's Buzzmeter rankings at The Envelope, it seems "Juno" has moved into the top five Best Picture considerations, while Paul Dano has lept up into the supporting actor fray."An early peek at Charlie Wilson's War, which opens Christmas Day, suggests that it could be the one war film people will enjoy seeing. Set in the '80s, it details the efforts of a Texas Congressman (Tom Hanks) to get arms to the mujahedin fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. The Mike Nichols film, co-starring Oscar winners Julia Roberts and Philip Seymour Hoffman, is at heart a can-do comedy about a wheeler-dealer having a good time doing good."Source: Time Magazine
James Newton Howard is a busy man this year. In addition to composing the music for "The Great Debaters," "I Am Legend," "The Lookout" and "Michael Clayton," I'm just now realizing he was tapped by Mike Nichols to replace the original composer on "Charlie Wilson's War" (which, FYI, explains the film's tardiness in a certain regard -- the sound mix is said to still be in the process of completion). Five films, four of them, perhaps, aiming for major awards contention.
Hope you catch up on some sleep over the holidays, Mr. Howard. Sheesh...
• Anne Thompson sticks it to the Academy screening committe for not giving the little guys a chance -- namely, "Lars and the Real Girl." [Thompson on Hollywood]
• indieWIRE tracks the buzz on documentary feature eigibility. [indieWIRE]
• David Poland follows suit. [The Hot Blog]
• And Sasha Stone, too. [Awards Daily]
• Claiming that "The Bucket List," "Charlie Wilson's War" and "Sweeney Todd" are looking "hazy" as Best Picture contenders, Jeffrey Wells thinks "The Great Debaters" is the season's last major hope. [Hollywood Elsewhere]
• Nathaniel Rogers has more insights into last week's Tim Burton event in New York. [The Film Experience]
• Tom O'Neil spins his wheels about the Oscar chances of "Margot at the Wedding." [Gold Derby]
• Ramon Setoodeh is still taking credit for a prediction that a) wasn't that unpopular when he made it; and b) hasn't exactly come to fruition yet, given that we're over two months away from nominations. [The Gold Digger]
• New York Magazine calls it a "great week for 'Diving Bell'" in it's latest weekly recap. [Vulture]
• Lou Lumenick chimes in with thoughts on the online "Sweeney Todd" events of the week. [New York Post]
• Randee Dawn talks to Noah Baumbach about "Margot at the Wedding." [The Hollywood Reporter]
Really getting into the thick of the awards season, Variety's special issues are starting to heat up. In print today: "The Contenders."
Universal Pictures has finally cooked up a one-sheet for Mike Nichols' "Charlie Wilson's War," and I have to say, it's a little bland. ComingSoon.net has the exclusive.
• Sasha Stone thinks "The Kite Runner" has the stuff to win Best Picture. [Awards Daily]
Red Carpet District is Variety contributor Kristopher Tapley's attempt at making sense of the ever-expanding glut of film awards coverage. He's been on the beat for six years. Email Kristopher Tapley