"Chicago 10" comes home; Ebert defends fest
The Chicago Reader's Jonathan Rosenbaum rephrases his bizarre animosity toward the fest every October, blaming the event for not having the alleged programming vision of celluloid shindigs in Toronto, Berlin, Venice and Cannes. The charge is, for the most part, ludicrous.
Sometimes never having heard of a film or its maker IS a warning sign but it can also be a harbinger of authentic discovery. The fest reinforces this with its New Directors competition. In addition, there were 17 first features in the non-competitive World Cinema section.
Ebert, who says "It was at the Chicago International Film Festival that I first saw films by Scorsese, Fassbinder, Nava and other future giants," posited some years back that, had the city cared more, Chicago should have grown to hold the slot that the much younger Toronto now enjoys.
The fest's board dreams of a permanent year-'round home, which shouldn't be a problem -- but apparently is -- in a city that can't tear down its remaining movie palaces fast enough and whose rabid construction of luxury condos has peppered the landscape with more cranes than a Japanese print.
The educational outreach division of Cinema/Chicago does an outstanding job of sensitizing Chicago area students to films they would not otherwise see.
"Chicago 10" stirred up lively discussion since many audience members had lived through the period so vividly depicted by proudly protective scripter, helmer and co-producer Brett Morgen, who acted out most of the courtroom reenactments for the film's motion-capture based animation segments. Morgen, who was born in the year of the 1968 Democratic National Convention, said that comments at screenings for high school audiences proved the hybrid doc's revisiting of anti-war activism is relevant for contemporary audiences of all ages.

Michael Jones is the film festival editor at Variety.com.












What? With the slimmed-down Reader, Rosenbaum barely had space for an intro this year. I'm curious, what did he write that upset you? I'm surprised at this take because his championing of the fest is part of what got me in the habit of going every year. Besides, didn't the main criticism of the fest this year come from Chicagoist? Also, hasn't Rosenbaum written that he prefers our quirkier festival to the commercial goings-on of Toronto? I don't at all understand your pov on this.
Posted by: Steve S. | 10/26/2007 8:02:41 AM