Production costs climb
Price of studio films on the rise despite cutbacks
|
More Articles:
Most Viewed:
'New Moon' breaks box office records(6423 views)'Avatar' toys with augmented reality(2557 views)Spielberg, King team on 'Dome'(2464 views)Ever capable entrepreneur(1814 views)Planet 51(1636 views)'Oprah' to end run in 2011(1476 views) |
Who's to blame? Sure, Disney spent $225 million on "Pirates of the Caribbean; Dead Man's Chest," but remember all the chopping of star salaries and production pacts? And who can forget Viacom's Sumner Redstone bragging about kicking Tom Cruise to the curb: "I hoped I was saying goodbye to a type of business." As it turns out, numbers are deceptive.
The MPAA only counts what member studios puts into picture budgets. Legendary Pictures ("Superman Returns") and Relativity Media ("All The King's Men") are co-financiers that don't exist in their statistics, so their money doesn't, either.
So here's the real bad news: The average negative cost for movies -- and their increase -- are likely much higher than anything you can find in the MPAA's stats.
And the real good news: Hits happen. "Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest" raked in more than $1 billion at the global B.O -- and with that haul came the MPAA's bragging rights to the 2006 B.O. bump.







