Contradictory Congress confounding satcasters
Mixed signals sent over mandatory antenna bill
|
More Articles:
Most Viewed:
Taylor Lautner to star in 'Max Steel'(3434 views)Jack Black animates film pitch(3225 views)'Blind Side' tackles box office competition(2703 views)Nine(1518 views)Bennett Miller to direct 'Moneyball'(1397 views)Overture nabs rights to 'Stone'(1041 views) |
"No one even told us about this amendment," said one frustrated satcaster rep in the hallway after the vote. "It's just astonishing that a Republican Congress would do this. They're forcing us to raise rates on our subscribers. This is a tax."
Satcasters quickly predicted they would be able to persuade members to strip out the provision before the bill, which is intended to amend the Satellite Home Viewer Act, went to a vote of the full House Judiciary Committee.
The amendment, offered by Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and backed by broadcasters, would require satcasters to "provide free of charge an over-the-air television broadcast receiving antenna" to anyone cut off as a result of illegally receiving distant signals. The antenna would have to provide at least a signal of "grade B" intensity, the lowest quality considered acceptable under federal standards.
Current subscribers in grade-B areas would be allowed to continue receiving distant signals indefinitely, but satcasters would have to immediately cut off grade-A subscribers, who make up the vast majority of the those receiving distant signals.







